October 8, 2003

|  Random  |  Permalink  |  1 Comment

Dick Cheney on 'Meet The Press'

Dick Cheney shows Tim Russert how many punches it would take for him to knock Tim on his ass.

TIM RUSSERT, HOST: Our issues this Sunday: Iraq and the war on terror. With me now is the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney. Thank you for coming on the show.

DICK CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you for having me, Tim.

RUSSERT: Mr. Vice President, I'd like to talk about the collaboration between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda...

CHENEY: Hold it, Tim. First of all, the President and his administration have never said that there was a collaboration between Saddam and Al Qaeda. We said there was a link.

RUSSERT: So there was no collaboration?

CHENEY: No, that's not what I said. I said we never said there was a collaboration.

RUSSERT: You're saying that you said you never said there was a collaboration. What are you saying now?

CHENEY: I'm saying there may have been a collaboration. We just don't know yet.

RUSSERT: How do you know there may have been a collaboration that you don't know yet?

CHENEY: It's too early to say.

RUSSERT: I see. So there was a tie between...

CHENEY: No, not a tie. I said a link.

RUSSERT: A link is different than a tie?

CHENEY: Yes. If there's a connection.

RUSSERT: How do you determine a connection?

CHENEY: Well, first you have to ascertain a relationship.

RUSSERT: I'm confused.

CHENEY: Look, it's very simple. Once you ascertain a relationship it becomes possible to find a connection that establishes a link as a tie.

RUSSERT: Okay, so there was a "link" between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. Considering the lack of WMDs found, is this link enough to back up the claims that Saddam was an imminent threat?

CHENEY: We never said he was an imminent threat, Tim. We said he was a gathering threat.

RUSSERT: What do you mean by gathering?

CHENEY: He was not an immediate threat.

RUSSERT: Just a possible threat?

CHENEY: No, more like eventual.

RUSSERT: Isn't eventual the same as imminent?

CHENEY: No, imminent is more immediate than eventual.

RUSSERT: So a gathering threat isn't as serious as an imminent threat?

CHENEY: No, it's very serious. Just not immediately.

RUSSERT: So we would have to wait for the threat to become serious?

CHENEY: No, we can't wait. We wouldn't have time to react.

RUSSERT: Why wouldn't we have time to react to a threat?

CHENEY: Because it wouldn't be a threat anymore. It would be an attack.

RUSSERT: When does it stop being a threat?

CHENEY: When it becomes serious.

RUSSERT: So a serious threat is not a threat at all, but an attack?

CHENEY: Yes, but a threatening one.

RUSSERT: Perhaps we should move on, Mr. Vice President. The DHS announced yesterday that it has raised the terror alert from yellow to orange...

CHENEY: I believe it was red.

RUSSERT: No, it was orange.

CHENEY: Orange is a kind of red, though.

RUSSERT: No, it isn't. There's still some yellow in it.

CHENEY: But it also has red.

RUSSERT: There's some red, but it's not all red.

CHENEY: True, but it's red that makes yellow orange.

RUSSERT: No, it's yellow that keeps orange from being red.

CHENEY: But it's closer to red than it was.

RUSSERT: Never mind. One last question, Mr. Vice President. Why do you think this administration will win the war on terror?

CHENEY: Because of our moral clarity.

This piece was originally published on mondoshow.com

 |  Subscribe  |  Subscribe  |  Random  |  Permalink  |  1 Comment